The Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett concluded this week. See the Day1, Day2, and Day3 transcripts. The committee vote will be next week, with the full Senate floor vote soon after. She will likely be confirmed by the end of October, with at least 51 votes in the Senate.
In three days of hearings, Judge Barrett comported herself well. By the third day, after she had been impressively composed, knowledgeable, and articulate on Day2, the Democrat members of the Senate Judiciary Committee noticeably backed off from attacking her directly. Why?
We may be waiting a loooong time for political sanity and public civility to return to America, so I’m tossing out eight ideas to keep us busy helping our countrymen and our great nation while we wait. They are meant to draw our attention away from distant Washington DC, and back to our own homes and Continue reading →
Here’s a portion of Book VIII of Plato’s Republic (written in 381 BC), as helpfully paraphrased by Will Durant in his popular 1926 book The Story of Philosophy. The numbers refer to the pages in Plato’s original Greek manuscript.
The brutal dictator Kim Jong-un and his militaristic communist government appear schizophrenic and paranoid that America is out to annihilate North Korea. The totalitarian dictator acts out his apparent paranoia by diverting resources from feeding and housing the estimated 25.4 million people in his country to developing, testing, and demonstrating dangerous nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.
This frightening behavior scares the hell out of other nations in the region, elicits warnings and sanctions from the international community including the toothless United Nations, and attracts displays of deterrent military strength from Continue reading →
Liberals are freaking out. Many call themselves Progressives. Most won’t say it, but that really means they want ‘progress on the way to socialism’. Unconstrained growth of the federal government to control more and more aspects of citizens’ lives is their goal — their end zone. Most avoid saying their goal is socialism, but it is. Despite no socialist nation having ever achieved sustained prosperity, Continue reading →
There are no good principled reasons to oppose term limits. A bogus reason people on the right use is: “When we get a good fiscal conservative in office, we want to keep her/him there to keep fighting for us.” I say BS….if conservatives can’t keep a good stream of emerging conservatives coming to consistently replace incumbents, we’re not worth our salt.
In the U.K., national elections are held for seats in the upper house (House of Lords) and lower house (House of Commons) of Parliament. Candidates affiliated with any political party can run and win a seat if they get the most votes from their local constituency. Following British tradition (not a written constitution), after this public phase of elections is finished, only then does the political haggling to build a ruling coalition start. The public does not get to participate in this political deal-making process. Factions within the Parliament seat-holders ally and oppose and bargain and eventually coalesce enough seats into a ruling majority called a coalition. By custom, that ruling coalition then elects a leader to represent them, and the Queen appoints that leader to the position of Prime Minister – a traditional formality. Thus the U.K. citizens are not directly involved in determining who the ruling coalition or PM will be.
In the United States, the public is directly involved in electing both their legislators and their President. Registered members of the major parties have the opportunity to participate in the building of coalitions and selection of candidates BEFORE the general election, by voting in the primaries. This approach takes the selection of candidates out of Continue reading →
Are you a cheap conquest? An easy catch? Will you consent to anyone that promises to be immediately pleasing? Do you avoid inquiring (or even wondering) about motives, preferring a superficial simplicity?
Or do you make your consent hard to get? Saved for someone who is committed to respecting you in the long run? Do you expect your chosen one to reciprocate by showing you solid fidelity and integrity in everything they do – even when nobody is watching them?
Let’s name it the General Law of Human Reciprocity:
In human social selections, your consensual standards set the height of the bar your ‘chosen one’ will try to leap.
Low bar = low results. High bar = high results.
This rule of thumb about human nature is widely useful, I dare say. In this article I will apply it to political behavior – of the governed and the governors. Especially the act of Continue reading →