Confronting Caricatures of Conservatives

Caricature of a heartless conservative(graphic credit)

An age-old practice in politics is to draw a caricature of one’s opponent, and then go to town criticizing it. 

Here’s a political cartoon that appeared in British newspapers in 1778, during the American Revolution, with George Washington on the right holding a zebra’s tail:

 British political cartoon from 1778

(graphic credit)

Distortions in the court of public opinion are called a “kangaroo court,” where the public discourse is so egregiously slanted that common sense is fundamentally denied, and the public “leaps” to a false conclusion:

The kangaroo court of public opinion

(graphic credit)

The verbal version of this tactic is called the straw-man argument, where the debater constructs a distorted version of an opponent’s position, which cleverly resembles the opponent’s actual position closely enough to fool naïve spectators, but is also designed to be flawed in exploitable ways.  The perpetrator then proceeds to beat the straw-man to a pulp, without ever actually refuting the opponent’s original position.

Check out this haystack full of straw men I spotted whizzing through the blogosphere recently:

Straw man arguments against conservatism

If you follow the link at the bottom of the chart, you will find each of these comparisons described with paragraphs of classic straw man arguments.  It’s like a free seminar in the dark art of shadow debate, where they’re not boxing against a real opponent – they’re instead shadow boxing against an opponent they’ve manufactured to be so inept that it never lays a glove on them.

Stare at that chart.  Look it up and down.  What’s your first instinct for action when you see this tactic used against you and your ideological mates in the blogosphere?

Do you put on your war paint, and ride your warhorse into crazed battle, with name-calling, finger-pointing, and expletives deleted (or not)?

Do you grab your collection of political books and the internet bookmarks to your favorite pundit sites, and settle into an extended tennis match of back & forth comments – hoping to win them over?

If you’ve tried the warrior strategy or the bookworm strategy, how’s that workin’ out for ya?  Seen any slain liberal dragons strewn about recently?

Me neither.

One alternative, to not waste your energy, is to dismiss / ignore these shadow-boxing liberal activists as sophomoric, and move along elsewhere for something with at least some thoughtful foundation underneath it.

But I have another suggestion for my fellow active conservative bloggers:

Make an objective effort to put yourself in the minds of all the impressionable, non-entrenched voters out there who are being targeted by the liberal shadow-boxing activists.  What are the lives of these unaffiliated or loosely-affiliated voters like?  What are they unsure about?  What are they insecure about?  What do they seek for themselves and their families?  Why are they open to listening to liberal ideology for the answers they seek?

Draw inspiration, not vitriol, from looking at that chart I showed you above.  Study what the committed leftists say, but don’t envision them as your audience.  Instead, do you see that crowd of folks standing between you and the far left?  That’s 20-25% of American voters.  They are your audience.

What can you write that simply states your vision – our vision – in a straight-on, affirmative way?  Not shrouded in euphemisms that attempt to hide (or not) your disdain for hardcore progressives, but instead articulated in your principles of reward for individual achievement, freedom to choose, and responsibility for self.

Something about conservatism appeals to you, right?  What is it?  Describe it in a positive manner.  Make it personal.  Reach down and pull it out in words that offer the idea — without arrogantly preaching it — to people who don’t grasp it.  Make it graspable.

You say you can write.  Maybe you even brag about it.  You started a blog to “put yourself out there” and/or to “make a difference.”  But can you express yourself and persuade impressionable people without pressing the FLAME key?

Can you persuade without flaming

(photo credit)

If you agree with me, pass the idea along to your fellow bloggers.


About Necessary and Proper

Jeff believes in the Individual's ability to excel when liberty and freedom of choice are protected. Also believes in the Community's ability to take care of the vast majority of its own issues and needs when the federal government leaves the Community's resources and sphere of control alone. State and local choice produce better results than centralized federal control.
This entry was posted in Politics in Practice and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Confronting Caricatures of Conservatives

  1. The “chart” you posted made me think of this quote by Frederic Bastiat in The Law:
    Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.

    Not all liberals are socialists, of course, but it’s the same argument used by the left today.

    Occasionally I will read an article on HuffPost or Mother Jones or some other leftist rag, and I’ll look at the comments. Besides being infuriating, I’ve realized that many on that side can not make the distinction that Bastiat speaks of; in their view, if something is right, then it should be law, and the way to decide if something is right is majority rule. If I may make a strawman of my own, to a progressive if something is good, it’s mandatory. Everything else is banned. 😛


    • Thanks, EC.

      Great comment. In the flow of the context, though, I would have picked slightly different words in one sentence: “We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we they want no religion at all, and that we don’t have a right to ours.

      – Jeff


  2. JohnRH says:

    Thoughtful post. That Conservative M y t h website is a piece of work. Fortunately my ADD (a conservative disorder most likely) discourages me from reading such extended verbiage and tripe. Good hearing from you again.


    • Thanks, John.

      Other than reblogging one of Dama Godiva’s articles, I took 3 weeks off to file our tax returns, and to cope with cooking only with a microwave oven and eating while sitting cross-legged on the floor…while we had our kitchen & dining room remodeled. Beautiful outcome, but MAN! it’s difficult to stay out of those rooms when they’re the path to the back door and you have 3 dogs and 2 kids. Seemed like an eternity.

      I, too, was unable to read all of those diatribes on that website.

      – Jeff


  3. Wizard Prang says:

    #1: Liberals, being Marxists at heart, favor forced redistribution of wealth. In their vision, there are no “wealthy”, and the producers go elsewhere. This has already happened, and is why I live in the U.S. instead of my native Britain.

    #2: Liberals have forgotten that it was the Republicans who freed the slaves, over the objections of the democrats.

    I didn’t bother with the rest. Liberals are delusional, and I say that as a former socialist.


Chime in! Leave Jeff a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s